Why Identity Politics is Bad

(Not something I was planning to write about, but I was having a chat about it and the subject came up …) First, it is a basic fact of human nature that, the larger any given group, the greater the number of a-holes. A group composed of 50 or so human beings will include a […]

via Why Identity Politics Are Bad — The Chrishanger



I came across this fascinating thesis on stupidity, I had to share.  All credit goes to the author.  I wish I had thought of it. diego

by Carlo M. Cipolla

The first basic law of human stupidity asserts without ambiguity that: 

Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.

At first, the statement sounds trivial, vague and horribly ungenerous. Closer scrutiny will however reveal its realistic veracity. No matter how high are one’s estimates of human stupidity, one is repeatedly and recurrently startled by the fact that:

a) people whom one had once judged rational and intelligent turn out to be unashamedly stupid.

b) day after day, with unceasing monotony, one is harassed in one’s activities by stupid individuals who appear suddenly and unexpectedly in the most inconvenient places and at the most improbable moments.

The First Basic Law prevents me from attributing a specific numerical value to the fraction of stupid people within the total population: any numerical estimate would turn out to be an underestimate. Thus in the following pages I will denote the fraction of stupid people within a population by the symbol å.


Cultural trends now fashionable in the West favour an egalitarian approach to life. People like to think of human beings as the output of a perfectly engineered mass production machine. Geneticists and sociologists especially go out of their way to prove, with an impressive apparatus of scientific data and formulations that all men are naturally equal and if some are more equal than others, this is attributable to nurture and not to nature. I take an exception to this general view. It is my firm conviction, supported by years of observation and experimentation, that men are not equal, that some are stupid and others are not, and that the difference is determined by nature and not by cultural forces or factors. One is stupid in the same way one is red-haired; one belongs to the stupid set as one belongs to a blood group. A stupid man is born a stupid man by an act of Providence. Although convinced that fraction of human beings are stupid and that they are so because of genetic traits, I am not a reactionary trying to reintroduce surreptitiously class or race discrimination. I firmly believe that stupidity is an indiscriminate privilege of all human groups and is uniformly distributed according to a constant proportion. This fact is scientifically expressed by the Second Basic Law which states that

The probability that a certain person be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.

In this regard, Nature seems indeed to have outdone herself. It is well known that Nature manages, rather mysteriously, to keep constant the relative frequency of certain natural phenomena. For instance, whether men proliferate at the Northern Pole or at the Equator, whether the matching couples are developed or underdeveloped, whether they are black, red, white or yellow the female to male ratio among the newly born is a constant, with a very slight prevalence of males. We do not know how Nature achieves this remarkable result but we know that in order to achieve it Nature must operate with large numbers. The most remarkable fact about the frequency of stupidity is that Nature succeeds in making this frequency equal to the probability quite independently from the size of the group.

Thus one finds the same percentage of stupid people whether one is considering very large groups or one is dealing with very small ones. No other set of observable phenomena offers such striking proof of the powers of Nature.

The evidence that education has nothing to do with the probability was provided by experiments carried on in a large number of universities all over the world. One may distinguish the composite population which constitutes a university in five major groups, namely the blue-collar workers, the white-collar employees, the students, the administrators and the professors.

Whenever I analyzed the blue-collar workers I found that the fraction å of them were stupid. As å’s value was higher than I expected (First Law), paying my tribute to fashion I thought at first that segregation, poverty, lack of education were to be blamed. But moving up the social ladder I found that the same ratio was prevalent among the white-collar employees and among the students. More impressive still were the results among the professors. Whether I considered a large university or a small college, a famous institution or an obscure one, I found that the same fraction å of the professors are stupid. So bewildered was I by the results, that I made a special point to extend my research to a specially selected group, to a real elite, the Nobel laureates. The result confirmed Nature’s supreme powers: å fraction of the Nobel laureates are stupid.

This idea was hard to accept and digest but too many experimental results proved its fundamental veracity. The Second Basic Law is an iron law, and it does not admit exceptions. The Women’s Liberation Movement will support the Second Basic Law as it shows that stupid individuals are proportionately as numerous among men as among women. The underdeveloped of the Third World will probably take solace at the Second Basic Law as they can find in it the proof that after the developed are not so developed. Whether the Second Basic Law is liked or not, however, its implications are frightening: the Law implies that whether you move in distinguished circles or you take refuge among the head-hunters of Polynesia, whether you lock yourself into a monastery or decide to spend the rest of your life in the company of beautiful and lascivious women, you always have to face the same percentage of stupid people – which percentage (in accordance with the First Law) will always surpass your expectations.


The Third Basic Law assumes, although it does not state it explicitly, that human beings fall into four basic categories: the helpless, the intelligent, the bandit and the stupid. It will be easily recognized by the perspicacious reader that these four categories correspond to the four areas I, H, S, B, of the basic graph (see below).

If Tom takes an action and suffers a loss while producing a gain to Dick, Tom’s mark will fall in field H: Tom acted helplessly. If Tom takes an action by which he makes a gain while yielding a gain also to Dick, Tom’s mark will fall in area I: Tom acted intelligently. If Tom takes an action by which he makes a gain causing Dick a loss, Tom’s mark will fall in area B: Tom acted as a bandit. Stupidity is related to area S and to all positions on axis Y below point O. As the Third Basic Law explicitly clarifies: A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or to a group of persons while himself deriving no gain and even possibly incurring losses. When confronted for the first time with the Third Basic Law, rational people instinctively react with feelings of skepticism and incredulity. The fact is that reasonable people have difficulty in conceiving and understanding unreasonable behaviour. But let us abandon the lofty plane of theory and let us look pragmatically at our daily life. We all recollect occasions in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his gain and our loss: we had to deal with a bandit. We also recollect cases in which a fellow took an action which resulted in his loss and our gain: we had to deal with a helpless person. We can recollect cases in which a fellow took an action by which both parties gained: he was intelligent. Such cases do indeed occur. But upon thoughtful reflection you must admit that these are not the events which punctuate most frequently our daily life. Our daily life is mostly, made of cases in which we lose money and/or time and/or energy and/or appetite, cheerfulness and good health because of the improbable action of some preposterous creature who has nothing to gain and indeed gains nothing from causing us embarrassment, difficulties or harm. Nobody knows, understands or can possibly explain why that preposterous creature does what he does. In fact there is no explanation – or better there is only one explanation: the person in question is stupid.


Most people do not act consistently. Under certain circumstances a given person acts intelligently and under different circumstances the same person will act helplessly. The only important exception to the rule is represented by the stupid people who normally show a strong proclivity toward perfect consistency in all fields of human endeavours.

From all that proceeds, it does not follow, that we can chart on the basic graph only stupid individuals. We can calculate for each person his weighted average position in the plane of figure 1 quite independently from his degree of inconsistency. A helpless person may occasionally behave intelligently and on occasion he may perform a bandit’s action. But since the person in question is fundamentally helpless most of his action will have the characteristics of helplessness. Thus the overall weighted average position of all the actions of such a person will place him in the H quadrant of the basic graph.

The fact that it is possible to place on the graph individuals instead of their actions allows some digression about the frequency of the bandit and stupid types.

The perfect bandit is one who, with his actions, causes to other individuals losses equal to his gains. The crudest type of banditry is theft. A person who robs you of 100 pounds without causing you an extra loss or harm is a perfect bandit: you lose 100 pounds, he gains 100 pounds. In the basic graph the perfect bandits would appear on a 45-degree diagonal line that divides the area B into two perfectly symmetrical sub-areas (line OM of figure 2).

However the “perfect” bandits are relatively few. The line OM divides the area B into two sub-areas, B1, and B2, and by far the largest majority of the bandits falls somewhere in one of these two sub-areas.

The bandits who fall in area B1 are those individuals whose actions yield to them profits which are larger than the losses they cause to other people. All bandits who are entitled to a position in area B1 are bandits with overtones of intelligence and as they get closer to the right side of the X axis they share more and more the characteristics of the intelligent person.

Unfortunately the individuals entitled to a position in the B1 area are not very numerous. Most bandits actually fall in area B2. The individuals who fall in this area are those whose actions yield to them gains inferior to the losses inflicted to other people. If someone kills you in order to rob you of fifty pounds or if he murders you in order to spend a weekend with your wife at Monte Carlo, we can be sure that he is not a perfect bandit. Even by using his values to measure his gains (but still using your values to measure your losses) he falls in the B2 area very close to the border of sheer stupidity. Generals who cause vast destruction and innumerable casualties in return for a promotion or a medal fall in the same area.

The frequency distribution of the stupid people is totally different from that of the bandit. While bandits are mostly scattered over an area stupid people are heavily concentrated along one line, specifically on the Y axis below point O. The reason for this is that by far the majority of stupid people are basically and unwaveringly stupid – in other words they perseveringly insist in causing harm and losses to other people without deriving any gain, whether positive or negative.

There are however people who by their improbable actions not only cause damages to other people but in addition hurt themselves. They are a sort of super-stupid who, in our system of accounting, will appear somewhere in the area S to the left of the Y axis.


It is not difficult to understand how social, political and institutional power enhances the damaging potential of a stupid person. But one still has to explain and understand what essentially it is that makes a stupid person dangerous to other people – in other words what constitutes the power of stupidity.

Essentially stupid people are dangerous and damaging because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behaviour. An intelligent person may understand the logic of a bandit. The bandit’s actions follow a pattern of rationality: nasty rationality, if you like, but still rationality. The bandit wants a plus on his account. Since he is not intelligent enough to devise ways of obtaining the plus as well as providing you with a plus, he will produce his plus by causing a minus to appear on your account. All this is bad, but it is rational and if you are rational you can predict it. You can foresee a bandit’s actions, his nasty manoeuvres and ugly aspirations and often can build up your defenses.

With a stupid person all this is absolutely impossible as explained by the Third Basic Law. A stupid creature will harass you for no reason, for no advantage, without any plan or scheme and at the most improbable times and places. You have no rational way of telling if and when and how and why the stupid creature attacks. When confronted with a stupid individual you are completely at his mercy. Because the stupid person’s actions do not conform to the rules of rationality, it follows that:

a) one is generally caught by surprise by the attack; b) even when one becomes aware of the attack, one cannot organize a rational defense, because the attack itself lacks any rational structure.

The fact that the activity and movements of a stupid creature are absolutely erratic and irrational not only makes defense problematic but it also makes any counter-attack extremely difficult – like trying to shoot at an object which is capable of the most improbable and unimaginable movements. This is what both Dickens and Schiller had in mind when the former stated that “with stupidity and sound digestion man may front much” and the latter wrote that “against stupidity the very Gods fight in vain.”


That helpless people, namely those who in our accounting system fall into the H area, do not normally recognize how dangerous stupid people are, is not at all surprising. Their failure is just another expression of their helplessness. The truly amazing fact, however, is that also intelligent people and bandits often fail to recognize the power to damage inherent in stupidity. It is extremely difficult to explain why this should happen and one can only remark that when confronted with stupid individuals often intelligent men as well as bandits make the mistake of indulging in feelings of self-complacency and contemptuousness instead of immediately secreting adequate quantities of adrenaline and building up defenses.

One is tempted to believe that a stupid man will only do harm to himself but this is confusing stupidity with helplessness. On occasion one is tempted to associate oneself with a stupid individual in order to use him for one’s own schemes. Such a manoeuvre cannot but have disastrous effects because a) it is based on a complete misunderstanding of the essential nature of stupidity and b) it gives the stupid person added scope for the exercise of his gifts. One may hope to outmanoeuvre the stupid and, up to a point, one may actually do so. But because of the erratic behaviour of the stupid, one cannot foresee all the stupid’s actions and reactions and before long one will be pulverized by the unpredictable moves of the stupid partner.

This is clearly summarized in the Fourth Basic Law which states that:

Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals. In particular non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times and places and under any circumstances to deal and/or associate with stupid people always turns out to be a costly mistake.

Through centuries and millennia, in public as in private life, countless individuals have failed to take account of the Fourth Basic Law and the failure has caused mankind incalculable losses.


Instead of considering the welfare of the individual let us consider the welfare of the society, regarded in this context as the algebraic sum of the individual conditions. A full understanding of the Fifth Basic Law is essential to the analysis. It may be parenthetically added here that of the Five Basic Laws, the Fifth is certainly the best known and its corollary is quoted very frequently. The Fifth Basic Law states that:

A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

The corollary of the Law is that:

A stupid person is more dangerous than a bandit.

The result of the action of a perfect bandit (the person who falls on line OM of figure 2) is purely and simply a transfer of wealth and/or welfare. After the action of a perfect bandit, the bandit has a plus on his account which plus is exactly equivalent to the minus he has caused to another person. The society as a whole is neither better nor worse off. If all members of a society were perfect bandits the society would remain stagnant but there would be no major disaster. The whole business would amount to massive transfers of wealth and welfare in favour of those who would take action. If all members of the society would take action in regular turns, not only the society as a whole but also individuals would find themselves in a perfectly steady state of no change.

When stupid people are at work, the story is totally different. Stupid people cause losses to other people with no counterpart of gains on their own account. Thus the society as a whole is impoverished. The system of accounting which finds expression in the basic graphs shows that while all actions of individuals falling to the right of the line POM (see fig. 3) add to the welfare of a society; although in different degrees, the actions of all individuals falling to the left of the same line POM cause a deterioration.

In other words the helpless with overtones of intelligence (area H1), the bandits with overtones of intelligence (area B1) and above all the intelligent (area I) all contribute, though in different degrees, to accrue to the welfare of a society. On the other hand the bandits with overtones of stupidity (area B2) and the helpless with overtones of stupidity (area H1) manage to add losses to those caused by stupid people thus enhancing the nefarious destructive power of the latter group.

All this suggests some reflection on the performance of societies. According to the Second Basic Law, the fraction of stupid people is a constant å which is not affected by time, space, race, class or any other socio- cultural or historical variable. It would be a profound mistake to believe the number of stupid people in a declining society is greater than in a developing society. Both such societies are plagued by the same percentage of stupid people. The difference between the two societies is that in the society which performs poorly:

a) the stupid members of the society are allowed by the other members to become more active and take more actions; b) there is a change in the composition of the non-stupid section with a relative decline of populations of areas I, H1 and B1 and a proportionate increase of populations H2 and B2.

This theoretical presumption is abundantly confirmed by an exhaustive analysis of historical cases. In fact the historical analysis allows us to reformulate the theoretical conclusions in a more factual way and with more realistic detail.

Whether one considers classical, or medieval, or modern or contemporary times one is impressed by the fact that any country moving uphill has its unavoidable å fraction of stupid people. However the country moving uphill also has an unusually high fraction of intelligent people who manage to keep the å fraction at bay and at the same time produce enough gains for themselves and the other members of the community to make progress a certainty.

In a country which is moving downhill, the fraction of stupid people is still equal to å; however in the remaining population one notices among those in power an alarming proliferation of the bandits with overtones of stupidity (sub-area B1 of quadrant B in figure 3) and among those not in power an equally alarming growth in the number of helpless individuals (area H in basic graph, fig.1). Such change in the composition of the non-stupid population inevitably strengthens the destructive power of the å fraction and makes decline a certainty. And the country goes to Hell.

(There is genius at work in this thesis. It came round about by way of reader Sam Keen, who sent us a thin gray monograph printed in Bologna, Italy. The trail eventually led to Carlo M. Cipolla, the author, who is currently Professor of Economics at UC Berkeley – Kevin Kelly

Whole Earth Review. Spring 1987 p 2 – 7)



I am concerned Boiling the Frog (part2)

diegoboiling the frog 

I am concerned as should every thinking person whether right or left or center.  Look at 2 things.  1) History and 2) who is drawing all the attention.


No rational person can really believe that fringe groups should set the bar on how we govern and how we run our lives. It has become apparent that lifestyle and social theory has become the bible that is running our world. We humans are instinctual creatures, more than we care to admit.  Our intelligence, I sometimes feel, wars with those instincts and causes us to act irrationally.  We wish to make the world friendly to our world view. This translates into the desire to control the world and make it utopia for what we feel is the right or only way to be. This also makes us easy to manipulate.


Point 1) History.

Through out history leaders have used the easily manipulated as shock troops to gain and hold power. Whether they push an agenda of religion, racism, sexual orientation or utopia, they find enough followers to truly believe in their vision.  Stalin, Hitler or Alexander the Great, it is all the same principle.


I will use Hitler as an example.  Hitler played on needing a scapegoat of why Germany was in decline and the Allied powers played right into his hands. Without the Treaty of Versailles Hitler may never have been in power. The treaty unmanned Germany and was intended to prevent Germany from ever becoming a threat. Look how that turned out.


Hitler used the Jewish people as a scapegoat to focus the anger of the German people and give them a reason their lives were so miserable and their economy failing. He used the weak minded as his shock troops, aka the Brownshirts and the SS.  Once he felt that he had achieved the goal of power and was firmly entrenched, these useful idiots were purged.  The reason the true believers were purged was they were dangerous to the regime which now had to make their empty promises reality and they could revolt. It is a method of securing power.


Stalin did the same.  16 million Russians died in his purge which was not all useful idiots but Russians who defied him in some way. Securing power by destroying your opposition.  Mao did the same. Pol Pot as well.  Genghis Khan scorched the earth once he conquered.


The point is this, it has been the same through out human history. Destroy and purge those who may become a threat to secure your power.


Point 2)  How it relates to today is the Left has been using LGBT, African Americans, Latinos, feminists, animal rights groups, environmental groups and the list goes on, to be their shock troops and useful idiots. Each of these groups may have valid points that should be considered but have allowed themselves to be suborned to the Left.  They are being used. Once power is secured, the promises become empty. African Americans and Latinos have been voting Left for years and are no better off.

People who disagree with these leftist groups mostly just want to be left alone to live their lives. Most do not care what you do in the privacy of your own self or home but do not want to be subject to having your lifestyle as the prominent focus of everything they do. However, these groups are not content to be left alone.  They want power and attention because they truly believe they are right and everyone should be like them.


This causes the Leftists to become enraged that the stupid people can’t see their vision, which causes a backlash from those who just want to be left alone.  Then the politicians get involved and stir things up even more by promising a “voice” to the fringes.  They now have recruited their shock troops. As long as these fringe groups are getting attention and promises, they will be good cannon fodder for the politicians. The Left and Right use these tactics to varying degrees.  Look at some of the elected politicians that are stood up in front of the cameras to make wildly irrational statements.  They are the useful idiots that can be easily controlled by the party leadership. Guess who gets purged once power is assured?  Donald Trump threw a monkey wrench into the works. The Leftists just doubled down on stupid to keep everything stirred up.


One thing that has become abundantly clear, we are failing as a species. The only way we can survive is to have and meet challenges to our survival.  If things become too easy we go off into lala land and believe our own bullshit. Make no mistake, the fringe does not want equality, they want control. What they don’t realize is that they are in no position to take that control and will be manipulated into more and more aggressive action until the backlash occurs. This backlash will be from the Right who has its own pool of useful idiots.  That backlash will be taken as the Left was right.  The Right is homophobic and racist.  Push anyone too hard and they will fight back.  The Leftists pushing the guilt will only go so far.


People are polarized right now and it will get more dangerous as the Left is marginalized more and more as people become wise to the game. Political correctness is killing us as we can not have a good argument without coming across as being mean to someone.  You can’t solve anything if you can’t have an honest argument about it. My thoughts are mine and if speaking them offends you to the point you want to kill me rather than argue me over to your point of view, we are lost. 




From a reformed Leftist

In case you missed it, our friends at americanthinker.com had a fantastic column (which won’t load now due to internal server error, but is cached by Google, so I repeat it here) by Dr. Danusha V. Goska in 2014. She was a life-long leftist and wrote that she has abandoned that philosophy. Here, she gives her […]

via A primer on the hatred of climate skeptics – one woman saw the light and is no longer a leftist — Watts Up With That?




I have noticed a trend lately that is disturbing. Its not exactly new but seems to be becoming more prevalent and accepted.

When the media gets caught in a lie, they don’t back down, but continue to repeat it as if it is truth. Most people do not take the time to research an issue so whatever they hear becomes their truth.

An example is Trump is anti-Semitic. This one has always puzzled me because Obama did everything in his power to destroy Israel. Trump has reaffirmed his support for our best ally in the middle East, yet the Jewish vote goes almost exclusively liberal. Hitler was a leftist who believed in big government controlling the lives and economy of his nation because he knew better what people needed. Sort of like modern leftist thinking.

The leftist infatuation with Islam also puzzles me.  Why support a culture that wants to do nothing more than enslave you or kill you? Women and gay rights in Islam is non-existent but our feminists howl at the slightest hint of a western man disrespecting them or their views. The recent Milo controversy shows that because he had conservative views and was against leftist ideology, his suffering as a victim of child sexual abuse is discounted. It is well documented that victims often become sympathetic to their abusers.  An example of this is an abused wife who stays with her abusive husband and defends him rigorously. A Muslim woman defending the very philosophy that abuses her as a human being and treats her as chattel is another example. Milo said some things better left unsaid but if he was a leftist ideologue, he would have generated a huge amount of sympathy and support. His life treated him badly and he is obviously affected by that treatment. He does show that being damaged psychically does not necessarily affect your intelligence or your usefulness to society. He needs help with some of his issues but, as a smart young man, will rebound and he has shown where his passion and drive in life is. I wish him well and look forward to what he accomplishes in the future. It is unfortunate that support for LGBT folks is only predicated on politics and what they can get you as far as votes. Life also has a messy side and everyone has their own set of demons and stories.

My latest least  favorite person is Chuck Schumer. This sleaze ball should be locked up for sedition. Opposing the president at every turn, repeating lies, stating lies and challenging Trumps mental fitness is childish and traitorous.  If you disagree with a policy there is a way to make that disagreement without resorting to gossip and school yard bully tactics. You are flailing Chucky and it will only get worse unless you grow up and start acting like an adult.

One statement about racism needs to be made. Illegal is not a race. It is a state of being.  If you are Polish, Mexican, Irish or whatever, you are a criminal if you are here illegally. Because Mexico has the best access to our country it makes sense to build the wall. If Mexico was Poland it would be no different. America has always welcomed immigrants but has never simply allowed anyone to immigrate. All we ask is you do it legally. Because progressives were so slack on enforcement in the past is why you have the communities of non-citizens that have been here for 20 years. You have to start somewhere and just like a strict parent who puts his foot down and demands good behavior, Trump will be demonized by the children on the left. I have a challenge.  Anyone that can prove they are not a racist will get me to register as a Democrat.  This is patently impossible to do so when you accuse someone of racism, it no longer has any meaning. All humans have their own perceptions of anyone who is different than them. Get over it.

Racism is hot topic that will never be solved until people realize that by hiding behind it as an excuse for failure and not allowing honest discussion, it will perpetuate forever. When a white or black person says that they hate the other because of “X” and are shouted down or invalidated, nothing changes. Both races have stereotypes built into their heads and these stereotypes need to be discussed and reality exposed to make them irrelevant. It boils down to the leftist convincing everyone they are victims and its not their fault they failed.

Victimhood is tearing us apart. That something is not your fault happens but deal with it and move on. Dwelling on failures and not moving forward is a killer of mind, body and spirit. Support in tragedy is humanitarian but support should put people back on a track to success, not become an industry that relies on a steady flow of victims to ensure the supporters success. There is big money in perpetuating victims and if the victims become self reliant they no longer need the supporters. This translates to political power for a “supporter class”.  The Social Justice Warriors. These morons will oppress everyone in the desire to “help” victims who don’t need their kind of help. Searching for micro aggressions, triggers and such is like wiping your butt with a hoop. The shit never stops and you can always find something to whine about or accuse someone of.

Why do people have guilt? Guilt is part of being human, it allows us to be social by having guilt if we do someone wrong. Unfortunately, we are creatures of instinct more than we admit and some are adept in using that guilt against us. Believe me when I say everyone is tortured by guilt. However, the SJW’s use that guilt to push people to have even more guilt and some self destruct. Utopia does not exist and humans will always be humans. We have not figured ourselves out and we do some bizarre things. The hypocrisy is stunning.  Banning speech in the name of free speech and democracy for instance.  Our colleges are part of the propaganda arm of the left.

Now Keith Ellison, Muslim Farakhan follower and anti-Semite may be leading the DNC.  Funny how Trump is blasted as an anti-Semite when a professed anti-Semite is ok because he is on the left. The left is doubling down on fringe groups hoping the Alinsky philosophy of tearing down organizations works.  Its the only way they may win, by rising from the ashes of a ruined world.



The Oxford Dictionary defines mutiny as “an open rebellion against the proper authorities.”  It is synonymous with “revolt and riot.”  For the last few decades George Soros and his Open Society Institute have organized a…

cropped-diego1AGW, war and other fictional topics My theory is that the human race began its decline with the extinction of the saber tooth tiger. They used to eat the dumb, loud ones. Political correctness and safety Nazis have turned us into a dependent weak species that could not miss 3 meals without descending into barbarism.

Source: The Oxford Dictionary defines mutiny as “an open rebellion against the proper authorities.”  It is synonymous with “revolt and riot.”  For the last few decades George Soros and his Open Society Institute have organized a…